As a die-hard fan of The Walking Dead, I’m sure I’m not the only one who was completely blindsided by the tragic death of Glenn Rhee. His brutal exit in Season 7 left many of us in a state of disbelief—screaming at the TV, maybe even shedding a tear or two (okay, maybe more than a few). But beyond the heart-wrenching scene, there’s an even bigger question that fans have been speculating about: why did they kill Glenn? Was it just for the shock value, or was there something deeper behind the decision?
When it comes to a beloved character like Glenn, fans are quick to jump to conclusions. Some believed his departure had to do with actor Steven Yeun’s contract negotiations. Others thought it was just a creative decision to keep the show unpredictable. While both of these theories hold some merit, there’s a much more complex reason behind it all—one that blends personal choice, long-term story arcs, and a push for fresh creative direction.
As we know, The Walking Dead thrives on shock value. It keeps us on our toes, unsure of who will survive and who will meet a gruesome end next. But Glenn’s death wasn’t just about a dramatic moment to rattle the fans; it was part of a bigger picture. Showrunner Scott Gimple and the writing team knew that in order to keep the show evolving, they needed to push the boundaries of what fans expected. Glenn was one of the original characters, and his death signaled that no one was safe—not even the ones we’ve been following since Season 1.
The article is not finished. Click on the next page to continue.
The article is not finished. Click on the next page to continue.
Next page
